• e - ISSN No : 2832-4277
IJRTTE Logo

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RECENT TRENDS IN TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING (IJRTTE)

AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance Framework for SCADA Controlled Industrial Plants

R. Jayaraj
Assistant Professor, Data Science and Business Systems, School of Computing, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.
Yamini R
Assistant Professor, Department of Computing Technologies, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, India.
Ajit Ratnakar Pradnyavant
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Annasaheb Dange College of Engineering and Technology, India.

Keywords: AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance, SCADA Systems, Industrial Automation, Real-Time Fault Detection, Explainable AI, Cybersecurity, Industry 4.0, Digital Twin Integration

Abstract

The predictive maintenance (PdM) has become a predominant gaming play for minimizing the downtime and resources utilization as well as for sustaining equipment reliability in the industrial settings. However, a numerous amount of the existed PdM methodologies have not been well- integrated with SCADA systems, real-time enough and not explainable a line with the human operators. This paper introduces a new AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance Framework for SCADA-based industrial plants. Utilizing real-time SCADA data feeds, machine learning algorithms as well as an XAI standard, the architecture is able to predict faults early, provide transparency in decision support, and schedule dynamic maintenance. As opposed to previous works, the proposed solution can be natively included in SCADA infrastructures providing a transparent interaction with the hierarchy control layers by adding cyber security-aware schemes for anomaly detection. The scalable solution enables customization for variety of industries like manufacturing, power generation and process industries. In addition, the framework promotes Industry 4.0 change by providing continuous loops between physical equipment and model intelligence opening the possibilities of integrating digital twins. Experimental verification shows that the proposed PdM framework results in efficient fault detection, improved operational efficiency, and cost savings, when compared to the current PdM approaches, with enhanced system transparency, safety, and sustainability.
Download Certificate
Details

References

  1. S. R. Suryadarma and E. H. Erik, “Predictive Maintenance in SCADA-Based Industries: A Literature Review,” Int. J. Ind. Eng. Eng. Manag., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–15, Jul. 2020.
  2. O. Serradilla, E. Zugasti, and U. Zurutuza, “Deep Learning Models for Predictive Maintenance: A Survey, Comparison, Challenges and Prospect,” arXiv:2010.03207, Oct. 2020.
  3. H. Zheng, A. R. Paiva, and C. S. Gurciullo, “Advancing from Predictive Maintenance to Intelligent Maintenance with AI and IIoT,” arXiv:2009.00351, Sep. 2020.
  4. J. Chatterjee and N. Dethlefs, “XAI4Wind: A Multimodal Knowledge Graph Database for Explainable Decision Support in Operations & Maintenance of Wind Turbines,” arXiv:2012.10489, Dec. 2020.
  5. F. Farhad Rustamova and F. Rustamov, “Problems of Integrating Artificial Intelligence with SCADA Systems,” Sci. Rise, vol. 4, no. 2, Jan. 2025.
  6. Balasubramanian, “AI‑Driven Predictive Maintenance and Process Automation in Industrial PLC Systems: A Case Study in the Oil and Gas Industry,” Int. J. Core Eng. Manag., vol. 5, no. 9, Dec. 2024.
  7. N. Kumar, V. A., and H. K. M. L., “IoT‑Based Predictive Maintenance for Electrical Machines and Industrial Automation,” Int. Res. J. Moderniz. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 4013–4015, Dec. 2024.
  8. Ucar, M. Karakose, and N. Kırımça, “Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 2, Art. 898, 2024.
  9. L. Rojas, Á. Peña, and J. Garcia, “AI‑Driven Predictive Maintenance in Mining: A Systematic Literature Review on Fault Detection, Digital Twins, and Intelligent Asset Management,” Appl. Sci., vol. 15, no. 6, Art. 3337, 2025.
  10. Y. Figueiredo et al., “Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Energy Systems Maintenance,” Energy Syst. Maint., in press, 2025.
  11. S. Cavus and A. Allahham, “AI‑Driven Fault Detection and Predictive Maintenance in Electrical Power Systems: A Systematic Review of Data‑Driven Approaches, Digital Twins and Self‑Healing Grids,” ResearchGate, Apr. 2025.
  12. J. Sekar, “SCADA and Operational Technology,” in Machine Learning for Auditors, Berkeley: Apress, 2022.
  13. Z. Sicanica, S. Sucic and B. Milasinovic, “Architecture of an Artificial Intelligence Model Manager for Event‑Driven Component‑Based SCADA Systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 30414–30426, 2022.
  14. S. Dey, “Predictive Maintenance for Smart Manufacturing: An AI and IoT‑Based Approach,” Libr. Prog. Int., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 11406–11423, 2024.
  15. R. Bouabdallaoui et al., “Predictive Maintenance in Building Facilities: A Machine Learning‑Based Approach,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 4, p. 1044, 2021.
  16. S. Nangia, S. Makkar, and R. Hassan, “IoT Based Predictive Maintenance in Manufacturing Sector,” Proc. ICICC, Mar. 2020.
  17. Aboshosha et al., “IoT‑Based Data‑Driven Predictive Maintenance Relying on Fuzzy System and Artificial Neural Networks,” Sci. Rep., vol. 13, p. 12186, 2023.
  18. R. Hadi et al., “Improved Fault Classification for Predictive Maintenance in Industrial IoT Based on AutoML: A Case Study of Ball‑Bearing Faults,” Processes, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1507, 2023.
  19. “Real‑Time Data Monitoring Framework for Predictive Maintenance Based on IoT,” Complexity, vol. 2023, Art. 9991029, 2023.
  20. G. Tancev, “Relevance of Drift Components and Unit‑to‑Unit Variability in the Predictive Maintenance of Low‑Cost Electrochemical Sensor Systems in Air Quality Monitoring,” Sensors, vol. 21, May 2021.
  21. Ma, K. A. Flanigan, and M. Bergés, “State-of-the-Art Review: The Use of Digital Twins to Support Artificial Intelligence-Guided Predictive Maintenance,” arXiv:2406.13117, Jun. 2024.
  22. L. Cummins et al., “Explainable Predictive Maintenance: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunities,” arXiv:2401.07871, Jan. 2024.
  23. M. Islam et al., “A Digital Twin-Driven Framework for Predictive Maintenance of Manufacturing Assets using IIoT Data,” J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 64, pp. 844–859, 2022.
  24. Y. Liu et al., “Deep Learning Enabled Predictive Maintenance in Industrial IoT: Advances and Challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2346–2360, 2022.
  25. B. Liu et al., “Data-Driven Predictive Maintenance for SCADA Systems: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 105831–105850, 2022.
  26. S. Mohan et al., “Cybersecurity Risks in AI-Driven Predictive Maintenance Systems: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 123456–123478, 2023.
  27. W. Zhang et al., “Edge-Intelligence Enabled Predictive Maintenance for Industry 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 8, no. 20, pp. 15815–15825, 2021.